Compassion and humanity is what women and all of us want.


As a woman, I often wonder why is it that the more conservative an ideology or even religion, the more misogynistic those who practice same are towards women; sometimes even including a few women acting in a misogynistic way towards other women. I am particularly concerned that the legislation being offered and enacted by Republicans, state and federal, attacking women goes one step further; it punishes us. For what? I believe for standing up for what is right and for what we believe in. It troubles me when I see a few conservative women supporting and vigorously fighting to achieve the same goal of disparaging women (i.e. disparaging themselves) and then punishing them for standing up against that disparagement.

So am I right to call conservative men and the women who support them as being misogynistic? Look at the definition of misogyny and the insight given by two world-famous sociologists and one need not look any further:

According to sociologist [writer, public speaker] Allan G. Johnson, “misogyny is a cultural attitude of hatred for females because they are female.” Johnson argues (Johnson, Allan G (2000). The Blackwell dictionary of sociology: A user’s guide to sociological languagethat:

“Misogyny …. is a central part of sexist prejudice and ideology and, as such, is an important basis for the oppression of females in male-dominated societies. Misogyny is manifested in many different ways, from jokes to pornography to violence to the self-contempt women may be taught to feel toward their own bodies.”  

Michael Flood defines misogyny as the hatred of women, and notes:

“Though most common in men, misogyny also exists in and is practiced by women against other women or even themselves. Misogyny functions as an ideology or belief system that has accompanied patriarchal, or male-dominated societies for thousands of years and continues to place women in subordinate positions with limited access to power and decision-making. [...] Aristotle contended that women exist as natural deformities or imperfect males [...] Ever since, women in Western cultures have internalised their role as societal scapegoats, influenced in the twenty-first century by multimedia objectification of women with its culturally sanctioned self-loathing and fixations on plastic surgery, anorexia and bulimia.” [....]

I appreciate it when someone is courteous towards me, i.e., opens the door for me, or is gracious and kind in some way because I am a human being and not just because I’m a woman. It’s the care, attention, and compassion from one human being to another that is important. I believe that most women in this country are looking for this kind of compassion and humanity from their leaders for themselves and all others. We are not looking for leaders who want to run our lives, think for us or decide what’s best for us because we are perceived as being something less than, and then enact laws to punish us when we don’t acquiesce to their way of thinking. I firmly believe that’s what we all want; besides, that’s the American spirit.

This is what inspires me about President Obama and the First Lady Michelle Obama. They care about the lives of everyone; even those who oppose them. It’s their humanity and compassion to reach out to the richest and the poorest, to all as human beings, offering each the same consideration and dignity.

Sadly, Mitt Romney and a growing number of Republicans (Tea Party folks), offers us just the opposite. I wish it were not so. I wish we could have political parties on all sides that put compassion and humanity first, that put forth legislation with the goal of creating value in the lives of everyone; but that’s not today’s reality. That’s why we are so fortunate to have President Obama.

Just yesterday, President Obama was in Denver talking about his commitment to strengthen both economic and health security for millions of women and middle-class families by helping women have access to preventive health services like cancer screenings, contraception and well-women exams. In stark contrast, Mitt Romney would roll back women’s access to these and other critical preventive care services, turn over women’s health decisions to their bosses and defund Planned Parenthood. Obamacare is helping 47 million women across the country access preventive health services mentioned above, and more.

The President is equally committed to keep urging Congress to immediately prevent a scheduled tax hike on 98 percent of Americans while Romney and his Party is determined to not just allow the tax hike but add to it. Here’s what some folks who did the math using their personal income and household to find out whose plan is the best and offers a real tax break.

About these ads

About The GroundHog

Words matter.
Classroom as Microcosm

Siobhan Curious Says: Teachers are People Too

Before the Downbeat

Thoughts on music, creativity, imagination, and exploring the space between the notes.

Garden of the Mind

by Rebecca Schwarzlose

A New Hype

ART / GRAPHICS / FONTS / ADS / ETC.

101 Books

Reading my way through Time Magazine's 100 Greatest Novels since 1923 (plus Ulysses)

Global Art Junkie

A curated serving of the visual arts

Whisky and Tea

Cava socialism, history, books.

Life As A YorkU Lion

YorkU life through my eyes.

Book of words

Books, reviews and all things worth reading

The Goat that Wrote

from the digital fountains to the analogue mountains

suehealy

Craft tips for writers

JSBTECHTIPS

Terrific Tech Tips!

The Same Rowdy Crowd

Ruminations and Fulminations on Communication

renxkyoko's space

Just another WordPress.com site

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,337 other followers

%d bloggers like this: